Your #1 Source for online D&D gaming!

Is there Latin language scholar in the house?

A place to leave general messages and, of course, a link to the main site. The Planet
Forum rules
All messages should be kept clean; religious and political comments will be deleted straight away.

This forum is for players registered in games on this site only.

See The Planet for more details and the main site.
Post Reply
User avatar
Stik
Baronet
Baronet
Posts: 2130
http://www.ibro.pl/blog/najlepsza-oferta-na-kuchnie-na-wymiar-w-warszawie/
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:00 am
Location: Long Island, NY
Contact:

Is there Latin language scholar in the house?

Post by Stik »

I'm looking for a translation of the titles "First King" and "First Queen".

Google translate gives me "Primus Rex" for First King, which makes sense, but gives me "Regina Primum" for First Queen. I get that the adjective has a female conjugation, but why does the word order change?
"No matter where you go, there you are."
mgbevan
Guildmaster
Guildmaster
Posts: 821
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 4:39 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Is there Latin language scholar in the house?

Post by mgbevan »

Not a scholar by any means but Rex and Regina are correct. Perhaps the word order changes to agree with gender?
User avatar
Breila
Grey Eminence
Grey Eminence
Posts: 5991
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:02 pm
Location: Swabia (SW Germany)

Re: Is there Latin language scholar in the house?

Post by Breila »

I'm not a scholare either, but I have a book about Latin Grammar, and I can ask people who have been or are studying Latin (it is a regular subject in schools in Germany, like any living language).

My first hunch is that in "Primus Rex", the noun actually is "Primus", as the first among equals, and "Rex" is more like an adjective (the first among the kings), whereas the "Regina Prima" has the normal word order of noun first, adjective second, that is still the rule in Romanic languages.
There's more to me than meets the eye...
User avatar
Stik
Baronet
Baronet
Posts: 2130
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:00 am
Location: Long Island, NY
Contact:

Re: Is there Latin language scholar in the house?

Post by Stik »

Just to clarify: "First King" in this case means the first man to wear the crown.
"No matter where you go, there you are."
User avatar
Breila
Grey Eminence
Grey Eminence
Posts: 5991
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:02 pm
Location: Swabia (SW Germany)

Re: Is there Latin language scholar in the house?

Post by Breila »

The first man to wear the crown would then most likely be the "Rex Primus".

My latin grammar specifies that the adjective is generally set after the noun, but can be placed before the noun for special emphasis.
So, if this first King was someone very special, important to the national legend, he might be known by a kind of honorary title as "Primus Rex".

You may have noted that in my earlier post, I wrote "Regina Prima" and not "Regina Primum" as google gave you, But the endings of the nouns and edjectives change with the grammatical construct (things like "of the queen" or "by the queen" are expressed like this, not with prepositions) and I always mix them up, and with the Italian forms, since I never have studied any of that formally.

Also, Latin has changed in the ~2000 years it was used regularly. A true scholar once told me that Medieval Latin and Classic Latin are really two different languages. Also, many people who used Latin made mistakes. So I guess you can use whatever feels right for your purpose.
There's more to me than meets the eye...
User avatar
temnix
Vagabond
Vagabond
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: Is there Latin language scholar in the house?

Post by temnix »

Maybe this will help you: in the days of the Roman Empire, "rex" was the word Romans used for monarchs of outlying countries, whom they considered barbarians, and for their own monarchs from before the republic. They hated the idea of a hereditary ruler lording it over them again, and Caesar was accused of that intention, so senators murdered him. When Octavian established the empire, he was called Augustus, that is, "grand," and "princeps civitatis," that is, "first citizen" (supposedly among equals). Never "rex." From that point onward ruling emperors had the title "augustus," along with "princeps," and "princeps" was the common word for a lord of any level. This was conveniently equivocal. "Dominus" is another one. Eventually the title "imperator" (conqueror) became the regular designation, but on the whole the word for "ruler" in antiquity you need is "princeps."

It was used in the Middle Ages too, for lords and officials of every caliber; but it basically stood for "lord of," so without other explanations it means a royal title. It's the origin of "prince" in the old sense of "lord." But if you want to underscore the fact of a crowning, then "rex" is the right choice. So-called barbarians had no qualms about being called "rex" or "regina" in the Latin language, because "king" was then more dubious, in Germanic languages it just means "ruler of (some) people." Any warchief powerful enough could be called a king, crown or not. Romanic languages took over from Latin in parlance in the 9th-10th centuries, but rulers wanted more legitimacy and a symbolic connection with everything Latin represents, so they continued to be called "rex Francorum... " etc. in documents, which continued, of course, to be written in Latin for centuries afterwards.

So: princeps for antiquity, unless it's about barbarians. There is no female form, because it just means "citizen." Rex Primus and Regina Prima for the Middle Ages (when queens came about).

Edit: hmm, the question was asked months ago. Oh well.
Post Reply